Welcome To Our Best Deals For Xmas Gifts Outlet Online Store Orders Over $150 , Enjoy Free Shipping,save $20 shipping cost!

canadian clothing company

Published: Friday 27 September, 2013

canadian clothing company canadian clothing company EPA action on fossil fuel power plants and



Environmental Protection Agency EPA will set greenhouse gas pollution standards for fossil fuel power plants and petroleum refineries two of the largest industrial sources, representing nearly 40% of the greenhouse gas pollution in the United States.



The EPA will propose standards for power plants in July 2011 and for refineries in December 2011 and will issue final standards in May 2012 and November 2012, respectively.



Meanwhile, Australia has scrapped plans for a $4.3 billion Queensland coalfired power station with carbon capture and storage capacity, because the technology isnt commercially viable. is going to waste a lot of time and money on patching up moribund technologies. At the same time, other countries use the revenues from taxes on cars and fuel to build up export industries in clean technologies. imposing fees on polluting products, while each time using the revenues to fund local rebates on the clean alternatives we need. fees on polluting cars and on fossil fuel consumption, with the revenues funding transport electrification and the transition to clean energy technologies such as solar and wind power. is increasing pressure on utilities to shut down older coalfired plants. Some may argue that there isnt enough clean energy available in their area, as if that could justify keeping coalfired power plants going. But if there isnt enough economic wind, geothermal or solar power available in one particular state, importing power over interstate transmission lines may already be an economic alternative now. The Obama administrations 2009 stimulus package allocated $6.5 billion in credit for federal agencies to build power lines and $2 billion in loan guarantees for private companies, so there is money available to build such capacity, which should only add a few cents per kWH. can and should adopt an even more effective policy by implementing local feebates, such as fees on fossil fuel that each time fund local rebates on clean energy and transport electrification programs.



The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC has just approved a proposal for the cost of transmission capacity to be shared among all stakeholders. Until we had an idea of how FERC was going the treat the cost allocation, comments Beth Soholt, Executive Director of the Midwest activist group Wind on the Wires, none of the transmission planned over the last five years could move forward. Seventeen projects are listed in the FERC filing. All of those lines are going to get more scrutiny now, Soholt said. According to the FERC decision, developers will still have to pay 90% of that cost. There will be an ongoing war over what an individual wind farm should pay, she said, and what should be spread more broadly across the footprint because it brings multiple benefits.source: greentechmedia



As I wrote in Ten reasons why Americ canadian clothing company a can win the clean energy race, this EPA announcement can act as a catalyst. Standards are not the most efficient way to facilitate the shift to clean energy. Standards encourage small incremental changes within obsolete technologies, rather than the more radical switches to the clean technologies that are needed instead. The looming prospect of EPA standards can make politicians consider feebates, the most effective way to fac canadian clothing company ilitate the necessary shift to clean energy.



Combining fees and rebates is the winning formula. Fees on polluting cars and fossil fuel will benefit the competitive position for the clean industries that are needed instead. Furthermore, using the revenues of such fees to fund rebates on clean alternatives makes those clean industries benefit twice.



Therefore, the most effective way to shift to sustainable economy is by imposing fees on polluting products, and then each time spending the revenues of such fees on the better local alternatives, such as transport electrification and producing energy with facilities such as wind turbines, solar panels, etc.



Obama is a great president who wants to do the right thing and who has the diplomacy and charisma to turn a lameduck session into a productive compromise that works for all of us. Obama has reached out to political opponents before, he can make inspirational speeches and win arguments in debate.



The Senate has just decided not to pass four measures intended to restrict the EPA in its efforts to cut emissions, reports Reuters, adding that White House spokesman Jay Carney said the Senate rejected an approach that would have increased the nations dependence on oil, contradicted the scientific consensus on global warming, and jeopardized Americas ability to lead the world in the clean energy economy.The White House had earlier stated that the President would veto such bills if they did pass in the Senate.



The arguments in favor of transport electrification and producing clean energy are overwhelming. I earlier pointed at the conclusion of a study that concluded that the vehicle sector caused $56 billion in health and other nonclimatechange damages in America in 2005. Were not even talking about CO2 yet, just about shortlived pollutants such as soot and precursors to ozone, which have a dramatic impact on global warming as well. Measures to reduce such pollutants, as proposed in a recent UNEP report, could reduce warming canadian clothing company in the Arctic in the next 30 years by twothirds, as well as avoid 2.4 million premature deaths and result in 1% to 4% higher crop yield. Such figures support a rapid shift to clean energy, with the promise of a huge global clean energy economy. Sadly, it appears that America does not fully embrace clean energy yet.



The EPA has proposed a new standard to reduce the acceptable amount of soot particulate matter under 2.5 micrometers, or PM2.5 in the air from 15 micrograms per cubic meter down to 12 to 13 micrograms per cubic meter, in accordance with the best available science. A federal court had ordered the EPA to propose new rules.



The Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program was launched by the EPA in October 2009, after the idea behind it was approved by Congress in 2007. The program requires facilities emitting at least 25,000 metric tons of greenhouse gases per year to collect accurate and timely data about carbon dioxide emissions and report annually to the EPA. Initially, the EPA told companies to submit their first inventory reports emissions for all of 2010 by March 31, 2011. The EPA now proposes to grant companies three more years until 2014 to comply with their reporting requirements under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, reports Reuters, adding that the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund and Clean Air Task Force are calling EPAs proposal potentially illegal. canadian clothing company

Back
#26 Youth Brandon Montour Premier Jersey: Adidas NHL Anaheim Ducks Green Salute to Service