Welcome To Our Best Deals For Xmas Gifts Outlet Online Store Orders Over $150 , Enjoy Free Shipping,save $20 shipping cost!

canada goose coat

Published: Wednesday 18 September, 2013

canada goose coat canada goose coat Do you believe that global warming is a serious problem that we have to deal with in our lifetime

Lets first say in our lifetime to mean the next 50 years. In those 50 years, its not likely that global warming or anthropogenic climate change, if you prefer is going to have a catastrophic influence on the world as we know it. Movies like The Day After Tomorrow notwithstanding, the scary bits that come from global warming are small, additive, and over time will cause what appear to be terrible conseque canada goose coat nces to us and other species biodiversity will decrease and as for us, it will be an economic catastrophe more than a visceral one.

Although the repercussions of global warming may not be fully felt by us in the next 50 years, that is not to say that it is a problem we ought not deal with. On the contrary, we should act now to forestall those future catastrophes, because the actions we take now will reap benefits in the future, in our childrens or grandchildrens lifetimes, over the next century or two.

Dont listen when people claim that to combat global warming we must hobble industry, or embrace ludditism. Thats not the case at all. We already have the technology to curtail the peoplecaused contributions to greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming all we have to do is pony up and take charge. And implementing and refining technologies like canada goose coat clean and safe nuclear power; renewable energy; carbon capture and storage; artificial photosynthesis well, technology means wealth, not the opposite.

So yes, global warming will be a serious problem, yes we should deal with it in our lifetime, and no, doing so does not cripple the economy any more than moving from an oilbased to a hydrogenbased fuel economy will cripple the energy companies. Theres financial benefits all around if we take the correct actions.

Although we may not reap immediate benefits from our actions today, our grandkids and their grandkids will.

Any conserving and recycling we can do will certainly be of befefit to future generations. I remember my grandmother using and reusing everything she possibly could. Diapers were cloth and were washed and used until they became dust rags. A single lamp could light a room. Plates and glasses were washed, no plastic ones thrown in the dump.

The car was only used for necessary trips to work and shop. Kids walked to school, to activities or rode their bikes. If their generation had been as wasteful as ours is right now, the landfills would have overflowed.

The TimeCNN poll found that threefourths of Americans say they consider global warming to be a serious problem. So a very strong majority of the US public embraces the idea that global warming is a real and serious problem even though only a slight majority perceives that there is a consensus in the scientific community on this question. The majority endorsing action divides on whether the problem is pressing and should include steps with significant costs or whether the problem can be dealt with more gradually through lowcost steps. However, when asked to assume that there is a scientific consensus on the reality of global warming, support for taking high cost steps increases to a majority. A majority rejects the argument that taking action is too economically onerous and is optimistic that in the long run reducing greenhouse gas emissions will actually benefit the economy by increasing efficiency. In a multilateral context support for taking action becomes overwhelming with very large majorities wanting to do as much as other developed countries to reduce emissions. Awareness of global warming is quite high.

Kyoto Treaty

A strong majority of Americans favors the US abiding by and ratifying the Kyoto Treaty even when presented with the key arguments for and against the treaty. Only a minority is aware that President Bush opposes participation in the Kyoto Treaty. When respondents are told that that President Bush has decided to not abide by the Treaty approximately half oppose the decision while a fairly small minority supports it. A strong majority opposes his decision to not pursue reductions of carbon dioxide emissions and thinks he should propose develop some plan for reducing emissions. A very large majority of Americans 8 in 10 say they support the targets of the McCainLieberman legislation Climate Stewardship Act that call for large companies to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases to 2000 levels by 2010 and to 1990 levels by 2020. Twothirds say they favor the legislation even if there are significant increases in the cost of energy. A modest majority says that if a candidate favors legislation requiring reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, this will increase the likelihood they will vote for that candidate; only a very small minority says that it would decrease the likelihood. Those in favor of taking steps are more likely to have their vote influenced by a candidates position than those opposed.

Readiness to Accept Increases in Energy Costs

Americans show a readiness to accept a moderate increase in their energy costs to deal with the problem of global warming and to comply with the Kyoto Treaty. At the same time Americans show an optimism that reducing greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved without a harmful economic impact and that technological innovations will be effective.

Strategies for Reducing Emissions

Americans support a variety of methods for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Very large majorities support strategies that provide tax incentives to utility companies that sell environmentally clean energy and to individuals who purchase energyefficient appliances. Very large majorities support major efforts to reduce automobile emissions by requiring higher fuel efficiency standards in automobiles even if this means higher costs, requiring half of all new automobiles to be hybridelectric or similarly highmileage by 2010, renewing the tax incentives for hybrids, and eliminating the tax incentives for large SUVs and Hummers. The strategy for reducing emissions through a system in which companies trade emissions allowances is not popular with the public, though arguments that it would reduce costs are convincing to a modest majority.

Trading Emission Rights

The level of additional energy costs most canada goose coat Americans find acceptable is sufficient to fulfill the requirements of the Kyoto Treaty according to US government estimates, but only if the US can get credit for purchasing emission rights from other countries. When Americans are presented the idea of such an emissions trading regime, initially the majority responds negatively. However, when Americans are presented arguments on both sides of the issue as well as the actual cost tradeoffs, a strong majority favors such a regime.

Participation of Developing Countries in Limiting Emissions

A majority believes that the developing countries should be expected to limit their greenhouse gas emissions, but that these countries should not have to reduce emissions. If the developing countries do not accept such limits, a majority nonetheless favors proceeding with the Kyoto Treaty or working to reduce emissions.

Foreign Aid for Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions

If the developing countries are willing to limit their greenhouse gas emissions, an overwhelming majority would support providing technology and training to help them.

Perceptions of Others Support for Action

By a wide margin, most Americans believe they are more supportive of taking steps to reduce global warming than the average American. Thus it appears the public underestimates the publics support for taking such steps. canada goose coat