Welcome To Our Best Deals For Xmas Gifts Outlet Online Store Orders Over $150 , Enjoy Free Shipping,save $20 shipping cost!

isabel marant wedge high tops

Published: Friday 27 September, 2013

isabel marant wedge high tops isabel marant wedge high tops ´╗┐Despite Radiation in Japan



THURSDAY, March 31 HealthDay News Almost three weeks after a massive earthquake and tsunami crippled four nuclear reactors in Japan, American public opinion on the risks and benefits of nuclear power hasn shifted much compared to three years earlier, a new Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll finds. public is almost equally divided on whether or not more nuclear power plants should be built on American soil, with 41 percent supporting the idea and 39 percent opposed. This represents only a slight change from three years ago, when 49 percent supported nuclear plants and 32 percent opposed them.problems with Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant have clearly influenced American attitudes to nuclear energy, but not by as much as I expected, said Humphrey Taylor, chairman of the Harris Poll, a service of Harris Interactive. for building more nuclear power plants in the United States is down, he noted , but still leaves the public split, 41 percent to 39 percent, with 20 percent not sure. Most people recognize the potential dangers of nuclear accidents but continue to think that nuclear power plants are at least safe. isn the first time a nuclear accident has influenced public opinion. According to previous Harris Interactive polls, in the mid1970s, almost twothirds of Americans were in favor of nuclear power. Following the 1979 Three Mile Island accident, however, only 47 percent were pro with isabel marant wedge high tops 45 percent against. adults, conducted March 23 to 25, 73 percent of respondents believed that nuclear waste disposal remains a problem, while 55 percent thought that the possible escape of radioactivity into the atmosphere is equally dangerous.Again, these numbers were only slightly above those of a similar Harris poll from three years ago, when the ratio was 72 percent and 51 percent, respectively.Almost a third of all adults 29 percent still consider nuclear power plants safe, with another 34 percent saying they are safe. In 2008, those numbers were very similar, at 34 percent and 33 percent, respectively.Still, in the new poll almost half of all adults 46 percent agreed that, risk of accidents and radiation exposure from nuclear power plants is too high to be acceptable. most people seemed able to see both sides of the debate.More than half 55 percent agreed that need to build nuclear power plants because they do not produce greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming and climate change unlike those that use oil, gas or coal, while 59 percent agreed that, is OK to build nuclear power plants if we build them far enough away from earthquake fault lines and areas with large populations. when presented with the other side of the argument, majorities agreed that accidents similar to the one in Japan could also happen in the United States 74 percent, and that people living near nuclear power plants are more likely to develop cancer than people who live farther away 54 percent.However, the relative equanimity of the American public may not be so surprising after all, especially given the thousands of miles that separate Japan and the United States, several experts noted.this idea that a disaster unhinges people left and right, said George Bonanno, a professor of clinical psychology at Teachers College, Columbia University in New York City.But when the disaster is remote, tend not to be affected by the disaster unless they lost somebody in the disaster or have a preexisting psychopathology. So there no real lasting psychological impact, he said. go around our daily lives and tend not to think about those things very often. Bloch, a professor at the California School of Professional Psychology in Alhambra, agreed. we pay attention to what right in front of us, so if you not in direct proximity to an event, then it seems further removed. You not going to see it as immediately impacting you, she said.Other factors that could be playing into a relatively muted fear response might isabel marant wedge high tops include the fact that the health risks from radiation are not immediate, and that the American public is now overwhelmed with other world events, such as the situation in Libya and in Egypt.so much going on in the news right now that the Japan nuclear disaster, for better or worse, may have taken a back seat, Bloch noted. Department isabel marant wedge high tops of Energy has more on nuclear energy.. isabel marant wedge high tops

Back