Welcome To Our Best Deals For Xmas Gifts Outlet Online Store Orders Over $150 , Enjoy Free Shipping,save $20 shipping cost!

long champ tote

Published: Wednesday 14 August, 2013

long champ tote long champ tote Gas tax bites the hand that feeds us



The review panel, chaired by former Finance Minister David Caygill, recommended the agricultural gases methane and nitrous oxide be brought into the scheme in 2015, as the current legislation requires.



In the panels model, farmers would be accountable for those emissions, which make up nearly half of New Zealands total greenhouse gases which in turn make up less than 0.2 per cent of the worlds total.



Why would we want to unfairly penalise New Zealands agriculture sector and one of the few sectors with the ability to help the country out of the current economic hole by imposing taxes when our international competitors are not doing the same?



I dont see how handicapping our main economic driver will reduce international greenhouse gases. Surely all that will do is shift the production of these agricultural greenhouse gases from New Zealand to another country?



Climate Change Minister Nick Smith has made a sensible decision in deciding that agricultural emissions will only be included if practical technologies are available to enable farmers to reduce their emissions and more progress is made by our trading partners to reduce their agricultural emissions. Federated Farmers is understandably delighted with the Governments move.



It has always argued that its crazy for New Zealand farmers to be hit with the costs of an ETS when they had no way of mitigating these and when other farmers around the world were not being penalised accordingly.



Meanwhile, critics and environmental doomsayers are not so happy and making claims about farmers being subsidised.



Now there are unfair claims be long champ tote ing made that New Zealand farmers are getting a free ride, but again this is selective reporting.



It is also disingenuous of the Herald, and others, to claim that current high export commodity prices are proof that farmers can afford to pay any costs imposed by agricultures introduction into an ETS.



The fickle nature of commodity markets means prices are likely to drop sooner rather than later.



When this happens, will the Herald then demand that farmers be excused from ETS costs due to low prices? Highly unlikely! Smith has said the Governments primary objective with the ETS is to drive investment into more efficient production. We are not interested in simply including agriculture in the ETS to impose a cost when there are not practical technologies through which they can reduce emissions, in contrast to a sector like electricity where there are really good opportunities.



There is already evidence long champ tote which is also noted by Caygills Review Panel that the agriculture sector is reducing its greenhouse gases. Emissions per unit of product from agriculture have fallen by about 1.3 per cent a year over the past 20 years due to improved management, animal genetics, pasture and crop genetics and technological changes.



Opportunities for further reductions included the use of forestry on marginal or erosionprone land, nitrification inhibitor long champ tote s, and good practice management techniques that increase productivity.



The Governments view that it wont support the introduction of agricultural emissions into the ETS until practical technologies are available to enable New Zealand farmers to reduce their emissions and more progress is made by our trading partners on measures to reduce emissions is smart, sensible and economically prudent. long champ tote

Back